Cit vs suresh chandra mittal

Author: tros

August undefined, 2024

WebC.R. Nagappa vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 4 September, 1968. ... vs Asstt. Cit on 21 May, 2004. Warning on Translation. User Queries. income tax returns . tax extender. … WebThe Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Suresh Chand Mittal, 251 ITR 9 (SC) held that in a case where the assessee originally filed return showing meager income, but after action u/s.132 in response to notice u/s.148, the assessee filed revised return showing higher income and the eventual assessments were based on such return, penalty …

Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs M:. Chandra Sekhar on 4 …

WebJan 30, 2024 · CIT vs Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9 (SC) CIT vs. SAS pharmaceuticals (2011) 335 ITR 0259 (Del) CIT vs. Pushpendra Surana (2013) 96 DTR 0231 (Raj) In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the concealment penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). WebIn case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 (SC), Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that if the assessee has offered the additional income to buy peace of mind and to avoid litigation penalty u/s.271 (1) (c) of the Act cannot be levied. hu berlin krankmeldung

cit vs suresh chandra mittal 251 itr 9 income tax income tax

Webvi. CIT vs Suresh Chandra Mittal(2000) 241 ITR 124 (MP) 2.2. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. The facts, in brief, are that a search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act was carried out at the business premises of M/s Etco Group as well as at the WebApr 15, 2012 · Contrast with Suresh Chandra Mittal 241 ITR 124 (MP) affirmed in 251 ITR 9 (SC) & CIT vs. Rajiv Garg 313 ITR 256 (P&H) & SAS Pharmaceuticals 335 ITR 176 … WebAfter going through the letter of the ITO, the CIT (Appeals) held that Lotus Mills Ltd. would get a heavy refund from the Income Tax Department and it would be in a position to … avasone

CONCEALMENT PENALTY 271(1)(c), 158BFA & 271AAA

Jayantilal Ambalal Chokshi, ... vs Department Of Income Tax

WebAug 12, 2024 · The assessee has relied on the following judgment. “Sale consideration offered for tax on receipt of notice u/s. 148 to buy peace of mind. Not proved by department that explanation of assessee was not bona fide Suresh Chandra Mittal relied SLP of dept dismissed In the case of CIT V/s. 1. Rajiv Garg 2. Siya Ram Garg 3. Sanjay Garg 4. avassistWebproceedings are not conclusive. The decision in CIT vs. Suresh Chand Mittal(251 ITR 9) (SC) further fortifies the case of the assessee. In the present appeal, when the wrong claim/mistake was brought to the notice of the assessee, that too, during assessment proceedings itself (before passing the assessment order), the assessee paid the due taxes, hu berlin kontaktformular

"WebSir Shadilal Sugar and General Mills Ltd vs. CIT (1987) 168 ITR 705 (SC) CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9 (SC) Even after proviso to explanation 1, voluntary surrender to buy peace penalty u/ s 271 (1) (c) can not be levied. Ramnath Jaganath vs. State of Maharashtra(1984) 57 STC 46,51 (Bom), " - Cit vs suresh chandra mittal

Cit vs suresh chandra mittal

B. Damodar Vaman Baliga vs Jt. Cit on 2 August, 2005 - Indian …

WebNov 23, 2016 · The assessee also relied on the judgment of Honble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal [251 ITR 9]. In the case relied up on by the assessee, the assessee has revised return of income under section 148 of the Act showing more income. Thereafter orders of the :: 7 :: ITA No.1450/Mds/2016 reassessment were … Web1 day ago · However, the AO initiated penalty proceeding under section 271 (1) (c) of the Act for concealment of income and finally levied the penalty which was also confirmed by the learned CIT (A). 10.1 It is a settled position of law that the penalty proceedings are different from assessment proceedings.

Did you know?

WebJul 20, 1999 · vs Suresh Chandra Mittal on 20 July, 1999 Equivalent citations: 2000 241 ITR 124 MP Author: B Khan-Bench: B Khan, S Singh JUDGMENT B.A. Khan, J. 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has made this reference and has filed statement of the case, for opinion of this court on the following question : WebIn this connection, in the case of Suresh Chandra Mittal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Hon'ble M.P. High Court in CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal [2000] 241 ITR 124, wherein it was held that " The Revenue did not at all discharge the burden to prove that there was concealment of income by the assessee.

Webcase of SureshChandra Mittal vs. CIT (Supra), the Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that the assessment was made by the Revenue and once the assessing authorities had failed to take any objection in the matter of surrender of income made by the assessee in his revised return, the explanation that he had WebMar 18, 2024 · In Suresh Chandra Mittal's case (supra) the Court came out with an epoch-making ruling, viz., if an assessee files a revised …

WebJul 26, 2001 · CIT vs Suresh Chandra Mittal – Supreme Court of India TG Team Income Tax - Judiciary Download PDF 26 Jul 2001 9,245 Views 0 comment Case Law Details … WebCommissioner Of Income-Tax vs Suresh Chandra Mittal on 26 July, 2001 User Queries ambal concealment of income undisclosed income revised return 153a penalty proceedings income tax returns suresh chandra mittal m. ambalal sureshchandra suresh chandra furnishing inaccurate particulars sec 153a penalty under section 271 1 c penalty u/s …

WebThe assessee has filed this appeal for assessment year 2002-03 against the order of learned CIT(Appeals) dated 17th January, 2011 disputing the confirmation of penalty of Rs.2,91,552/- levied u/s 271(1)(c). ... The Tribunal after considering the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 deleted the ...

WebIn CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal [2001] 251 ITR 963 (SC) the assessee filed revised returns showing higher income after search and notice for reopening of assessment, to purchase peace and avoid litigation and Department simply rested its conclusion on the act of voluntary surrender done by the 8 I.T.A. No. 327/Del/2014 Assessment year 2008-09 ... avassistvvWebIn case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 (SC), Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that if the assessee has offered the additional income to buy peace of mind … avast 2022 activation keyWebMay 3, 2024 · ORIGINAL PDF. Manjit Singh v. Cit. This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT (A)10, New Delhi, Dated 26.07.2024, for the … hu berlin kontaktWebcit vs suresh chandra mittal 251 itr 9 income tax income tax F: Deleration in Annexure v F: Applicability of GST F: Switching Over From Regular to Composition Scheme F: Input tax credit F: Transporter issuing builty required to take gst registration? F: Non Genration of E-way Bill or genration of Incorrect E-Way bill , Imp... hu berlin latinistikWebMay 2, 2015 · In case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 (SC), Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that if the assessee has offered the additional income to buy peace of … avast antivirus activation key till 2038Webcit vs suresh chandra mittal 251 itr 9 income tax income tax F: Deleration in Annexure v F: Applicability of GST F: Switching Over From Regular to Composition Scheme F: Input … avast antivirus kokemuksiaWebIndian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law avast 19 8 activation key